Dark Patterns


Why is it in the news?

Recently, the Centre has introduced draft guidelines for the prevention and regulation of “dark patterns” on the Internet, with a focus on e-commerce platforms.

Definition of Dark Patterns

  • Dark patterns are defined in the draft guidelines as practices or deceptive design patterns using user interface or user experience interactions on any platform.
  • These patterns are designed to mislead or trick users into actions they did not originally intend or want to take, thus impairing consumer autonomy and choice.
  • Dark patterns are considered as misleading advertisements or unfair trade practices, violating consumer rights.

Types of Dark Patterns

The draft guidelines identify various types of dark patterns, including:

  • False Urgency: Creating a false sense of urgency.
  • Basket Sneaking: Adding additional items to the user’s cart during checkout without their consent.
  • Confirm Shaming: Using fear, shame, ridicule, or guilt to influence user decisions.
  • Forced Action: Forcing users into actions that require buying additional goods.
  • Subscription Trap: Making cancellation of paid subscriptions difficult.
  • Interface Interference: Manipulating user interface elements.
  • Bait and Switch: Advertising a particular outcome based on user actions.
  • Drip Pricing: Not revealing all price elements upfront.
  • Disguised Advertisement: Presenting content as non-promotional when it’s advertising.
  • Nagging: Persistent and annoying prompts.

Applicability

The guidelines are intended to be applicable to all individuals and online platforms, including sellers and advertisers.

Enforcement Challenges

  • Some experts caution that enforcing these guidelines might be challenging, particularly in cases where determining whether a practice qualifies as a dark pattern is not straightforward.
    • For instance, accurately assessing the legitimacy of claims like “only 2 rooms remaining – book now!” may pose challenges.

How Companies, including social media and Big Tech firms, employ dark patterns for their benefit?

  • Amazon:
  • Faced criticism in the European Union for a complex cancellation process for Amazon Prime subscriptions.
    • They later simplified the process in 2022 for online customers in European countries.
  • LinkedIn:
    • Users often receive unsolicited sponsored messages from influencers.
    • Disabling this option is a challenging process that involves multiple steps, requiring users to be familiar with platform controls.
  • Google-owned YouTube:
    • Nags users to sign up for YouTube Premium through pop-ups that obscure the final seconds of a video with thumbnails of other videos.

Global efforts to combat dark patterns

  • California, USA: Passed amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act in March 2021, prohibiting dark patterns that obstructed consumers from exercising their privacy rights.
  • United Kingdom: Issued guidelines in April 2019, later enforceable under the Data Protection Act, 2018, to restrict companies from employing manipulative tactics to attract underage users into low privacy settings.

Get free UPSC Updates straight to your inbox!

Get Updates on New Notification about APPSC, TSPSC and UPSC

Get Current Affairs Updates Directly into your Inbox

Discover more from AMIGOS IAS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading