Home » Blog » The Dark Side of AI Voice Cloning

The Dark Side of AI Voice Cloning

By Amigos IAS

Why is it in the news?

  • Rising concerns surround AI voice cloning due to a surge in related scams, raising fears about the misuse of this technology.
·       Market US reports a significant growth in the AI voice cloning market, estimating its value at $1.2 billion in 2022, and projecting a substantial increase to nearly $5 billion by 2032, reflecting a notable CAGR of 15-40%.

Voice Cloning

About

  • Scammers use online programs like Murf, Resemble, and Speechify by uploading audio clips to replicate voices accurately.
  • Recently, AI-generated speeches, like that of imprisoned ex-PM Imran Khan, were used for political purposes.

Diverse Applications

  • Legacy Preservation: AI voice cloning keeps the voices of loved ones alive for future generations. Apple’s iOS 17 introduced voice cloning to aid those at risk of losing their voice to degenerative diseases.
  • Personalized Experiences: Custom virtual assistants, interactive storytelling, and immersive digital interactions.
  • Gaming: Meta’s SeamlessM4T translates nearly 100 languages in real-time, enhancing gaming experiences.
  • Accessibility: Provides a voice for those losing it due to illness or disability.
  • Song Creations: YouTube’s Dream Track allows the creation of song clips featuring AI vocals with permission from pop stars.
  • Creative Applications: Enhancing storytelling, audio games, and immersive experiences.

 

Emerging Issues

  • Scams and Threats: Incidents like a fake kidnapping in Arizona, U.S., using an AI cloned voice for ransom.
  • Reporting Challenges: Many AI voice cloning cases go unreported, leading to underestimation of the issue.
  • Disinformation: AI voice clones contribute to the spread of fake news, exemplified by Emma Watson’s alleged reading of Mein Kampf.
  • Privacy and Consent Concerns: Unauthorized recording and use of voices without consent raise ethical and privacy concerns.
  • Ethical Considerations: Potential exploitation, manipulation, and emotional harm through impersonation and misuse.
  • Social Implications: Impact on identity, trust, and communication dynamics in the digital age.
  • Hate Speech: Misuse of AI voice cloning tools for generating celebrity hate speech. For instance, conservative political pundit Ben Shapiro’s alleged racist comments against Democrat politician Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez.

 

Measures Taken

  • Regulatory Frameworks: Emphasizes the importance of robust legal and ethical guidelines. For instance, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission considers adopting measures to deter deceptive voice cloning.
  • Technological Safeguards: Watermarking and authentication mechanisms to identify and verify cloned voices.
  • Public Awareness: Vital to educate the public about voice cloning technology and potential risks.
  • Voice Cloning Challenge: Launched by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to gather ideas for detecting, evaluating, and monitoring cloned devices.
  • Responsible Development: Promoting ethical and transparent use of voice cloning for positive societal impact.

 

India: A Prime Target for AI Voice Cloning Scams

 

A report titled ‘The Artificial Imposter’ revealed alarming statistics about AI voice clone scams in India:

·       Published in May last year, the report highlighted that 47% of surveyed Indians either experienced or knew someone who fell victim to AI-generated voice scams.

·       This percentage is nearly twice the global average of 25%, making India the top target for AI voice scams.

A specific incident in December involved a Lucknow resident falling victim to a cyberattack that used AI to mimic the voice of the victim’s relative. The attacker requested a substantial amount to be transferred through UPI.

 

McAfee reported that Indians exhibit particular vulnerability to such scams: 66% of Indian participants admitted they would respond to a voice call or a phone call that seemed to be from a friend or family member urgently in need of money.

 

The report also highlighted that 86% of Indians were prone to sharing their voice data online or via voice notes at least once a week. This frequent sharing of voice data has made Indians more susceptible to AI voice clone scams, as attackers exploit this readily available information.

 

Signup for newsletter

Receive notifications straight into your inbox

Leave a comment

Item added to cart.
0 items - 0.00

Discover more from AMIGOS IAS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading