Home » Blog » FAO Report: Hidden Costs of Global Agrifood Systems

FAO Report: Hidden Costs of Global Agrifood Systems

By Amigos IAS

Why is it in the news?

  • A recent report from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) highlights the hidden costs of global agrifood systems, exceeding $10 trillion.
  • In middle-income countries like India, these costs constitute nearly 11% of GDP, leading to increased poverty, environmental harm, and health-related impacts such as undernourishment and unhealthy dietary patterns.
  • The report attributes these escalating costs to “unsustainable business-as-usual activities and practices” and emphasizes the need to transform agrifood systems.

 

Major findings of the Report

  • Intensive agriculture practices in India, such as monocropping and chemical-intensive farming during the Green Revolution, have led to impressive productivity but caused environmental and social issues.
  • The Green Revolution focused on high-yielding varieties of paddy and wheat, comprising over 70% of India’s agricultural production.
  • Infusion of seeds from multinational corporations and fertilizers has undermined seed sovereignty, dismantled Indigenous knowledge systems, and shifted from diverse crop varieties to monoculture, impacting nutrition and ecological health.
  • Privatization and deregulation of agricultural inputs have significantly increased farmer indebtedness, with the debt to asset ratio of a farmer household in India being 630% higher in 2013 compared to 1992.
  • Policies under the National Food Security Act 2013 assure subsidized food for 65% of households, but procurement heavily favours rice and wheat, leading to neglect of coarse grains, impacting biodiversity.
  • The expansion of sugarcane cultivation under policies favouring investments in dams and canal irrigation threatens food security, biodiversity, and contributes to environmental pollution.
  • Small and marginal farmers in India, ironically, remain among the most food and nutrition insecure.
  • Global trade relations, such as fluctuations in soy prices and historical influences, have impacted income for farmers in regions like Malwa.
  • Crop diversification, rooted in agroecology principles, is proposed as a solution to revitalize degraded land and soil.
  • Diversified multi-cropping systems, like ‘akkadi saalu’ in Karnataka, involve intercropping with legumes, pulses, oilseeds, trees, shrubs, and livestock, offering benefits like cash provision, ecosystem services, and biodiversity support.

 

Suggested Measures

  • Critics argue against alternative farming systems, but the FAO report emphasizes the substantial “hidden costs” of current systems.
  • Millets are highlighted as a viable alternative with comparable yields to rice and wheat, being more nutritious, environmentally friendly, and requiring minimal input.
  • Redirecting subsidies from corporations to farmers is proposed to incentivize the contribution to sustaining natural capital instead of depleting it.
  • Acknowledging the impracticality of an immediate shift, the report recommends a systematic transition for farmers, moving from chemical-intensive to non-pesticide management and adopting natural farming practices gradually.
  • Economic modelling of diversified farm allocation indicates potential improvements in ecological outcomes and sustained farm incomes in the short and long run.
  • Addressing challenges related to local seeds, institutional arrangements, drudgery, and farm labour is crucial for successfully scaling up diversified cropping practices through collaboration among institutions, policymakers, and social groups.

Signup for newsletter

Receive notifications straight into your inbox

Leave a comment

Item added to cart.
0 items - 0.00

Discover more from AMIGOS IAS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading