Why is it in the news?
- Lok Sabha Passes Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, 2023.
- Lok Sabha has passed the bill after it was earlier approved by the Rajya Sabha.
Background
- The 1991 Act lacked provisions for the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and other Election Commissioners (ECs).
- Recommendations from the Dinesh Goswami Committee on Electoral Reforms (1990) and the Law Commission (2015) suggested a committee comprising the Prime Minister, Chief Justice of India (CJI), and Leader of the Opposition for appointments.
- Supreme Court emphasized a ‘stop-gap’ arrangement and suggested a panel with the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition, and Chief Justice of India.
Highlights of the Bill
Aspect | Details |
Appointment Process | – President appoints based on Selection Committee’s recommendation. – Selection Committee: Prime Minister, Cabinet Minister, and Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha. |
Search Committee | – Headed by Cabinet Secretary. – Proposes five names for consideration. – Allows the Selection Committee to consider individuals beyond those suggested. |
Eligibility Criteria | – CEC and ECs must possess integrity, knowledge, and election management experience. – Must have been Secretary (or equivalent) to the government. |
Term and Reappointment | – Members serve for six years or until age 65, whichever is earlier. – No reappointment allowed. – If an EC becomes CEC, the overall term may not exceed six years. |
Salary and Pension | – Salary, allowances, and conditions equivalent to the Cabinet Secretary. – Option to draw pension and retirement benefits from previous service. |
Removal Process | – Removal of CEC in the same manner and grounds as a Supreme Court Judge. – ECs can be removed only upon the recommendation of the CEC. |
Key Issues
- Concerns about the Union government’s dominance in the selection process, potentially compromising the Election Commission’s independence.
- Accepting Committee recommendations during a vacancy may lead to government monopoly in candidate selection.
- CEC and ECs’ salaries fixed by the government, contrasting with a Supreme Court judge’s salary set through an Act of Parliament.
- CECs and ECs perform quasi-judicial functions.
- Limiting posts to senior bureaucrats may exclude other qualified candidates.